Aesthetically, there remains something profoundly fascinating about their still, mute forms, their monumentality, their essential ‘pearness’ & ‘thing-in-itself’ quality, & I think this is communicated in some way by the photographs, yet photographing them seems such an unsatisfactory means of exploring & capturing this in comparison to drawing & painting, where time spent looking, in contemplation of formal and surface qualities seems much more rewarding and is capable of producing a more profound result.





Given what I considered to be the failure of the camera to adequately communicate the surface colour and quality, I consequently decided the pears were photographically more interesting when wreathed once again in their protective coverings, & thus snapped a few more images. I enjoy here both the surface qualities and the hints as to what lies beneath, within: form and colour, for instance. Perhaps here photography, in representing the strangeness of something actually existing, achieves a better result than drawing or painting, whose results may appear more contrived or invented, self-consciously surreal even, and therefore less convincingly believable. As ever, it’s instructive to explore the potential of any given medium for achieving the most appropriate aesthetic resolution to a given visual problem.



No comments:
Post a Comment